Some suspect that Android outperforms Apple in these speeds tests because Apple tends to be more hesitant when rolling out new tech compared to many of their competitors. In low-signal conditions, Qualcomm phones worked faster and maintained those speeds for a longer period of time. The study found that devices using Qualcomm performed better than phones that did not (iPhones use Intel). It appears that, depending on strength of signal and the device you’re using, yes, Android phones get better reception.Īs the article states, the LG V40 was the top performer for cellular signal. After looking at their findings, it’s hard to argue with the data. In it, they say that iPhones consistently place second behind Samsung Galaxy phones in speed tests. has an article on their site titled, “The LG V40 Has the Best Cellular Reception of Any Phone” that they released a few years ago (2018). Read all the way to the end before coming to any conclusions. But take the explanation with a grain of salt. Is this true? Is there available technology that would even make this possible? In recent years, many internet users claim Android phones get better reception than iPhones. Can manufacturers develop their phones in such a way that they are prone to better overall reception? If so, which devices are they? Do Androids Really Get Better Overall Reception Than iPhones? One thing we haven’t discussed is the claim that certain smartphones themselves get better signals than others. We’ve discussed the science behind it, what causes bad cell signal, how to improve it, how to learn which carrier has good coverage in your area, and more. The SureCall blog is full of articles explaining the technology of cellular reception. A common Google inquiry is, “Which smartphone gets the best reception?” Is there really a phone that gives users better reception no matter what network they’re on? The actual answer is yes and no.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |